Buffy the Vampire Slayer Essay -- Television TV Show Essays

Buffy the Vampire SlayerWhile the first seasons of Buffy be structured around an external threat seeking to corrupt the assemble of the world, later the source of the threat becomes increasingly internal, and the characters moldiness embrace a side of themselves which is evil, irrational, or dangerous. When Giles lands an arguably sincere Ben, he does not brave the moral ambiguity that Willow encounters when she kills a guilty Warren. Willow has to grant with an evil internal to her in a way Giles does not, and this apparent variance is the result of a general evolution of the series, rather than a bivalent standard. The murder of Ben is comparable to the murder of Warren, charge though Ben is mostly innocent and Warren is mostly guilty. They are both human, and their deaths are necessary to peak further evil. Even though Ben cohabits the same(p) body with the hell paragon Glory, he, as an indep ratiocinationent being, is innocent of Glorys actions, as the Scoobies uniform ly agree What about(predicate) Ben? He can be killed, right? I mean, I cut hes an innocent, but, you know, not, like fall into place innocent. We could kill... a regular guy... (no we couldnt) God. Even the script directions (no we couldnt) put forward that the way Xander delivers these lines should emphasize the moral impossibility of killing Ben as a way of stopping Glory. Being Glory is to Ben what being the Key is to Dawn it could make him otherwise but it cannot make him either good or bad on Glorys behalf. It is true that Ben is guilty of other things -- he muster the demon who kills (or merely finishes off) Glorys brain sucked victims and, in Listening to Fear, there is even a real chance that Joyce might get killed because of him (an event which Buffy prevents from happening). ... ...umans into vampires) at some point someone has to draw the line, and that is always going to be me. You get down on me for cutting myself off, but in the end the slayer is always cut off (Selfless). At the same time, she is the most ambiguous one, the one who is ready to cut all ties with family and friends and kill people she loves, if necessary (e.g., Angel). The requirement that she know exactly which side she must stay on (regardless of where those she loves are) gives her the responsibility to keep the other other at all costs -- even at the cost of becoming an other herself. This would be the moral equivalent of dying to save lives in The present -- in this case, crossing over to the dark side in bless to prevent others from doing it. Paradoxically, she protects the line which separates good from evil by crossing it, by becoming more and more other.