Dual and Multiple Relationships and Boundaries

Case bring 14 is an illustration of a clinical event that has a potency malign in terms of loss of objectivity and conflict of interest. Teresa macrocosm a overlord counselor is entangled in a sextuple kindred with her lymph gland. The ethical concern is on maintaining the boundaries. The potentiality of Teresa crossing them is high up and precautions have to be taken.According to Herlihy and Corey,( 2006), boundaries assume crossed if there is unlikeness from acceptable practices thus putting the client at a venture of harm. A nonher ethical concern is on whether Teresa pull up stakes adhere to the law of ethics as expected of a professional counselor without elastic to more or less temptations. Another concern is on how effective Teresa exit be as a counselor in the way she cargo decks Chris problem because the potentiality of her being influenced by the fact that Chris engender is her best friend, is high.Barbara Herlihy and Gerald Corey, (as cited from Knapp and Verdecreak, 2003) state that a sexual dual relationship is an absolutely harmful situation that should be avoided by all means because the repercussions severely affect individuals negatively. However the situation in the case of Theresa and Evelyns son, Chris has a low potentiality of harm especially if Teresa takes some important pre-cautions.Comp ard to sexual-dual relationship, counselors are also harmed or get stressed because circumstances force them to play different roles simultaneously and beguile between them can be very difficult. Gerald, Marianne and Patrick ( as cited from Lazarus and Zur, 2002) state that some multiple relationships are not harmful and are unavoidable. This can be explained by the fact that none of the statutes of ethics deem non-sexual relationships unethical.This situation has a hap of having a negative impact for instance impairment of astuteness by the counselor because of the aspect of friendship between Theresa and her clients mother, alo ngside this is the possibility of Chris not being open enough to talk about everything that bugs him for alarm of disclosure to the mother by his counselor. He may want to conceal some information to protect him from the Teresa who is the mothers friend. Efficacy in this case is questionable in the end, resulting in the client not acquire the help he needs.My recommendation for Teresa would be to find another unconditional colleague to do the counseling. One who does not have affiliations of every kindhearted to both Chris and the mother. I would advice her to strongly advise Evelyn that the potential harm or risk is more intense than the hustle that comes with the 3km that she would have to do when movement Chris to another counselor.This case can be ethically resolved by the following stepsa) Teresa has to weigh the potential harm that exists if she takes on the counseling.b) Upon starting signal of the counseling session, Teresa should call upon her supervisor or colleague at usage to supervise how she handles the counseling.c) Another consideration is that Teresa should explain about the risks to both Chris and his mother so as not to lose her friendship to Evelyn and to make it polish off why she cannot counsel Chris.She should ask herself whetherAccording to (Gottlieb and Younggren) as mentioned by Gerald, Marianne and Patrick, Teresa should sustain the necessity of entering into a professional relationship since the friendship relationship still exists. Secondly, she should find out any potentiality of harm to the client in the event that she enters into a multiple relationship i.e. both the intimate one and the professional one. Teresa should determine whether the dual relationship is going to summate value to the situation and if it will influence the manner in which she will analyze the problem.Thirdly she is obliged to let the parties at stake see the risks that come with multiple relationships and let the client to have a participatory role in the decisions made. Having done all these and there being no risk of harm Teresa should put every thing in writing showing consent by the client where the latter even appends his signature. finally the counselor should consult with her colleagues who support the decision.In circumstances where a non professional relationship is unavailable the counselor should make sure that he does not cross boundaries or rather he just holds on to practices that are beneficial to the client. He should let the clients know about the pros and cons of dual or multiple relationships and should be prepared to face arising conflicts and discuss about the like with clients.The counselor should be alert incase he finds out that he might give an impaired professional judgment or foresees harm, in which case he should reach out to other professionals for advice on how to handle any problematic situation. Dual relationships need to be documented. The last choice would be to recommend counseling function from another professional. Herlihy and Gerald, citing St. Germaine (1993), suggest the above procedures to protect the client from the harm.As I disseminate my duties I will always make sure that I avoid dealing with clients with whom I have existing relations like friends, relatives and business associates. In follow with this I would strictly maintain boundaries by refusing to receive gifts from clients, or exchanging goods and services for the services I render (Gabbord, 1994, 1995, 1996 Gutheil and Gabbard 1993). Finally, I would always refer to the code of ethics and see to it that I dont breach any of them. I would always keep it professional through documentation and file of proceedings for furtherreference.ReferencesBarbara, H., & Gerald, C. (Eds.). ACA Ethical Standards Casebook (6th Edition). Gerald, C., Marianne, S, C. & Patrick, C. (Eds.). ISSUES AND ETHICS IN percentage PROFESSIONS (7th Edition.)