Religion vs. Rights: Which One Belongs In Schools? :: essays research papers

Religion vs. Rights Which One Belongs In Schools?     Before the government provided lump schools and programs of education, religion had been a major part of every persons education. As normal schools started, this teaching of faiths continued with the practice of solicitation before class and ledger reading sessions (Burstein, 26). Were those actions taken in these classes constitutional, or did the practicing of religious activities deny people the freedom of religion guaranteed in the constitution? Many of those who find prayer and religion in school offensive say that it is a entrancement of their rights. Mr. Justice Black of the United States Supreme Court, once said, "The First Amendment has erected a wall between the Church and State which must be pass on high and impregnable" (Bosmajian, 7). Those in support of religious teachings in ordinary schools see participation in theological activities as a pass off to teach morals, community ethi cs, and peace over violence. Nevertheless, the achievement of those goals through the abnegation of basal rights is wrong. Todays society is, fast paced, competitive, and set upd totally on equality. Consequently, religion, whether it be denominational or non, has no habitation in the classrooms of todays public schools. The reasons for this short letter are the establishment article, the rulings of the Supreme Court, and the role that a school has in a community.     What is stopping this process of allowing prayer and schools to combine? The establishment clause is the main cause of this roadblock. The American public seems to think that the establishment clause, or religious freedom, means that personal beliefs can be instituted any place at any time. They feel that the courts interpretation of the clause not lonesome(prenominal) takes God out of the lives of the students, but that the removal of religion also removes basic ethics and the teaching of mo rals (Gay, 65). This removal of ethics seems to have peradventure caused the lack of respect for teachers and education as a whole. The courts say that this rights habit is to create a wall that will separate the church from the rural area and that it will not and can not fall. This clause is the rock, on which they base all their decisions on, where they turn to figure out whether a violation of rights had occurred. To send this idea into more simple terms, the purpose of the anti-prayer position is that the government does not want to specifically support, show preference of, or exclude and exceptional religion or denominational sect (Burstein, 28).